the wake of our campaign to defend health and water, we point out the initiative "I will vote May 29" .
By June there will be 4 referendum. One
in defense of justice, against the legitimate impediment. Two
in defense of public water.
One on the return to nuclear power.
There is a perfect date to go to vote: May 29, along with administrative
. No additional cost to the state, that is, for all of us.
Someone will try to move the referendum in June,
wasting around 350 million euro of public money. What
is their goal? Urge citizens not to vote, on the contrary
of what the Constitution says:
ensure maximum participation in elections. A
robbed of all of us to fund a fraud on democracy.
The referendum is a democratic path and clean to participate in political life without games palace.
In order to involve as many citizens as possible (friends, relatives, acquaintances ...) disseminate and share this message.
Why a referendum on water?
parties, corporations, banks and entrepreneurs with the usual hooks are just putting their hands on business public water taps and millions of Italians. Among these might be here. The government has launched a year a rule requiring public companies to divest most of their capital to the private sector by 2011.
For years, a grand coalition of social and urban look, instead of defending the public management of water control and promoting the direct participation of citizens in deciding on a common asset of vital importance.
Visit http://www.referendumacqua.it
Why a referendum on nuclear power?
Nuclear power plants are enormously expensive and, even if they provide a lot of energy, electricity that costs more than conventional produce. The wastes are a permanent nightmare for millions of years, spread around their sites of radioactive pollutants are extremely dangerous in the long danger, as demonstrated by German studies on childhood leukemia, an accident at a nuclear plant is always catastrophic and the effects last for a period can not be quantified.
Mario Tozzi is explained best in his blog:
1 - sites impossible
2 - Reserves of uranium
3 - Accidents
4 - Benefits
5 - Attempted synthesis
Central Italian
After the nuclear - I've been to Hiroshima
definitely interesting the investigation of Report on nuclear .
Informiamoci.
For years, a grand coalition of social and urban look, instead of defending the public management of water control and promoting the direct participation of citizens in deciding on a common asset of vital importance.
Visit http://www.referendumacqua.it
Why a referendum on nuclear power?
Nuclear power plants are enormously expensive and, even if they provide a lot of energy, electricity that costs more than conventional produce. The wastes are a permanent nightmare for millions of years, spread around their sites of radioactive pollutants are extremely dangerous in the long danger, as demonstrated by German studies on childhood leukemia, an accident at a nuclear plant is always catastrophic and the effects last for a period can not be quantified.
Mario Tozzi is explained best in his blog:
1 - sites impossible
2 - Reserves of uranium
3 - Accidents
4 - Benefits
5 - Attempted synthesis
Central Italian
After the nuclear - I've been to Hiroshima
definitely interesting the investigation of Report on nuclear .
Informiamoci.
0 comments:
Post a Comment